|
Return
Back to Recent Press Clips
Boston
Globe - State finds easy access to social security numbers of deceased A
provision in federal law that reformed welfare in the 1990s also created
a loophole that could allow swindlers to obtain the Social Security
numbers of the recently deceased, according to a recent finding by the
state auditor’s office. The
provision, which took effect in 1998 in Massachusetts, requires that the
state’s Registry of Vital Records and Statistics include Social
Security numbers on all certified death certificates. And anyone can
obtain a death certificate from the registry for $18. “Coupled
with a gap of several months before deaths are reported to the Social
Security Administration, this scenario reflects a significant
vulnerability in confidentiality and homeland security,’’ state
Auditor Joseph DeNucci wrote this month in a letter to congressman
Stephen F. Lynch. “The ability of individuals or entities to acquire
multiple Social Security numbers by a simple request is an open
invitation to identity theft.’’ DeNucci
asked Lynch, a South Boston Democrat, to seek a way to close the
loophole. Lynch
said he is trying to find a solution to the problem. He said he has
contacted the US House of Representative’s Information Policy, Census
and the National Archives Subcommittee, which has jurisdiction over the
law. “We
will be seeking either a legislative or regulatory fix to the current
situation,’’ Lynch said in a statement last night. “Congress has
been grappling with the wider issue of identity theft and is currently
in the process of scheduling hearings to further investigate the
vulnerability created by personal information contained in
government-issued documents.’’ State
officials said they have no evidence that anyone has taken advantage of
the loophole. “We
are not aware of any abuse of the system,’’ said Jennifer Manley, a
spokeswoman for the state Department of Health, which oversees the
registry. “Death records do not have any access restrictions, and we
began capturing Social Security numbers in 1940.’’ DeNucci
said the problem was discovered during a routine audit this year of the
“security and confidentiality of personal information collected’’
by the registry. While
there is no evidence that anyone has sought death certificates to assume
a dead person’s identity, DeNucci noted that over the years his
investigators have found people using false Social Security numbers to
fraudulently obtain everything from public benefits to the ability to
work in the United States. “The
misuse of others’ Social Security numbers is well known among law
enforcement agencies as a prime method of securing a new identity for
individuals entering the country illegally or otherwise establishing a
new identity to engage in illicit activities,’’ DeNucci wrote in the
letter. Glenn
Briere, a spokesman for the auditor, cited one case of a woman from
Haiti who received extensive cancer care in Massachusetts three years
ago by using the Social Security number of someone who had died. She
obtained thousands of dollars worth of health care with a fraudulent
Medicaid card identification number before she returned to Haiti. It
was not clear how she obtained the Social Security number. Briere said
he could not provide more information about that case or cite other
incidents of those similarly abusing the system. Middlesex
District Attorney Gerry Leone said it is important the loophole is
closed to protect surviving relatives of the deceased who have had their
Social Security numbers stolen. “Identity
theft is devastating on the victim and, in the case of a decedent, such
fraud survives the death to do potential harm to a spouse or
estate,’’ Leone said in a statement. “In these times of fiscal
crisis, predators will resort to lowly means to compromise people and
their assets, so we owe the public a duty to engage in whatever
proactive preventative steps that we can to help protect against
identity theft and related fraud.’’ In
his letter, DeNucci warned Lynch that the loophole could have dangerous
consequences. “The good intentions of improving child-support enforcement have resulted in compromising security,’’ he wrote. “In this post-9/11 world, we cannot afford to continue this practice.’’ |
|
| Mailing Address:oseph DeNucci
P.O. Box 600252 Newton MA 02460 Office Location: 259 Walnut St Newton, MA 02460 Phone: 617.630.0600 Fax: 617.630.0625 E-Mail: HDQ@JoeDeNucci.com |
|